Reston National Golf Course: What the Filed Engineering Drawings Reveal About 306 Tiny Condos, Night Lights, Driving Range, 612 Residential Cars, No Traffic Study, a Mid-Course Restaurant.
The Precedent Being Set for the Last 36 Acres in Your Backyard & the 150 Acres Up Next.
Part 1 of this series documented the three concurrent zoning applications filed by Virginia Investment Partners 2019, LLC and NVR Inc. — the ones that don’t surface when you search by address, or project name in Fairfax County’s PLUS system. That post is now on record with Supervisor Alcorn’s office, prompted a public correction to the county’s own case summary, and has been viewed by more than 2,100 Restonians in its first few days.
Part 2 is about what is actually inside those applications. Not the press summary. Not the concept language from a community meeting. The filed engineering drawings accepted by Fairfax County on March 27, 2026.
What those drawings show is not a golf course upgrade. It is a commercial entertainment complex — operating into the evening, seven days a week — that happens to have fairways attached. And it is sliding in without a change in zoning, without a traffic study, and without anyone defining where the night lights stop.
Why do I care? I don’t live in Reston and/or I don’t adjoin the Reston National Golf Course.
- The 1966 zoning application is challenging the process to build residential property on a PRC defined Open Space lot via an amendment.
- If the door opens, there are two more applications waiting to follow suit with this “PRC Amendment” process versus the Site-Specific Planning Amendment (SSPA) process that failed to approve these applications twice before.
- Next up in Reston, 150 acres of privately held Open Space as the Hidden Creek Country Club.
- Following within the County, privately held Open Space lot amendments to redevelop or as this developer calls it, “Golf Re-imagined” rendering the Comprehensive Plan irrelevant.
Reston has allies within the Hunter Mill District within the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. However, this is not a single Reston PRC issue and there are 11 other Planning Commission members and 9 other Board of Supervisors holding votes on sacrificing current home values as the cost of expanding the use of amendments in lieu of the SSPA process circumventing the Comprehensive Plan for Fairfax County.
What the 1966 Approval Said and What has Been Filed Now
The entire legal basis for this application rests on a 1966 Board of Supervisors approval — RZ B-555 — that designated approximately 14 acres of the Reston National Golf Course property for medium-density residential development at a maximum of 20 units per acre.
One more thing on the unit count: the press reported 288 units. The filed applications say 306. Supervisor Alcorn’s office confirmed this in writing on April 24th, 2026 — in response to my April 20th inquiry — and the county’s own case summary was updated accordingly. The public record now reflects 306.
3 Applications not 1, Filed Representing:
306 Stacked Condo Units Across Two Clusters
All 306 units are stacked townhomes – condominiums. No yards. No freestanding garages. No private outdoor space. The applicant’s own Statement of Justification (SOJ) uses the term ‘stacked townhomes’ throughout.
The units split across two residential land bays, both carved from the 81-acre western parcel:
NVR Inc. — the Ryan Homes and NVHomes parent — builds stacked townhomes in this submarket in the 1,400 to 1,800 square foot range at or above $800,000. That is $450 to $570 per square foot for a condominium unit, with Condo fees and the Reston Association (RA) annual fees on top, looking at either a stormwater detention pond or a lighted commercial driving range.
There is no public park. No playground. No dog run. No community green space accessible to anyone outside the development. The five ‘amenity areas’ described in the application are small interior courtyards tucked between condo buildings — private, not public.
This Is Not a Golf Course Upgrade. Read the Engineering Labels.
The press has described the golf course improvements as ‘modernization.’ That framing is accurate as far as it goes. What it leaves out is the scale, the location, the operating hours, and who is sitting next to all of it.
Here is what the filed engineering drawings state — exact language from the documents accepted by Fairfax County on March 27th, 2026.
CLICK TO ENLARGE
1. The Multi-Story Lighted Driving Range
The 2-story, 35-foot tee structure sits immediately adjacent to the existing clubhouse at 11875 Sunrise Valley Drive. The lighted targets are positioned across the fairway. Ball flight from tee to target travels directly toward the existing townhome community of Golf Course Square inside the application boundary.
Light poles are shown dotted across the range. Proposed netting runs along the southern boundary — the boundary with existing homes. That netting is the only separation between a commercial driving range in full evening operation and residents who bought homes next to a quiet golf course.
2. The Back 9 Grill — Mid-Course Restaurant
A 2,000 square foot standalone restaurant building on Soapstone Drive — mid-fairway, enclosed by a 6-foot chain link fence, accessed directly from the road. The applicant’s own communications with county transportation staff confirm this generates independent customer traffic. It is not a snack bar. It is a commercial restaurant in the middle of a residential PRC community.
3. The Full FunZone — Everything Filed and Everything Promised
Three of eight commercial entertainment elements have no engineering drawings in the filed application. Night golf, simulators, and instructional facilities exist only as written commitments in the SOJ. The community is being asked to approve a commercial entertainment program where the most impactful element — night golf lighting — has no defined location, no designated holes, no photometric study, and no boundary showing where the light zone ends.
The Night Golf Problem — The Most Important Unanswered Question
The SOJ states: ‘night-golf options across a portion of the outdoor course.‘ That is the entire description. No sheet. No hole numbers. No lighting plan. No photometric study. No boundary.
The driving range location is drawn — you can see exactly where it sits relative to existing homes. The night golf zone is completely undefined. Could be holes along Sunrise Valley. Could extend over the north condo clusters. Could run all the way down through the south land bay to South Lakes Drive. The filed documents do not say.
The county should consider a defined night golf boundary, hole designations, and a photometric study showing light spread to adjacent residential properties before the Planning Commission votes on November 4th. That answer does not currently exist in the filed documents.
The Zoning Question Nobody Has Asked
The Fairfax County Zoning Ordinance permits golf driving ranges as a Category 5 use in PRC residential zones. The applicant is using that language to argue that no separate commercial zoning is required for any element of the Commercial FunZone. Is this intent of the ordinance or a stretch for this amendment application?
But the ordinance was written decades before a 2-story, 35-foot, commercially operated, Top Tracer technology, lighted-until-night driving ranges existed anywhere. The ordinance draws no line on scale, operating hours, lighting intensity, commercial intensity or proximity to residential homes. A 500-slip marina is also on the Category 5 list — nobody would argue that belongs in a PRC residential zone by right.
Two Existing TH Communities Completely Surrounded.
The 63-acre application boundary does not sit on empty land. Two existing townhome communities are inside the boundary of the application area.
These residents bought homes adjacent to a quiet 60-year-old golf course. What the filed engineering drawings show arriving around them: a 2-story lighted driving range with illuminated targets, chain link fencing as the property boundary, a 35-foot commercial restaurant on Soapstone Drive, 306 new stacked condo units filling the remaining land, night golf lighting with no defined boundary, and two stormwater detention ponds as the view from units that don’t face the range.
They did not get a notice. They did not get a vote. They did not get a study of what this does to traffic on their street or light levels in their homes. That is not a political statement. It is a description of what the PRC plan amendment process does and does not require
No Traffic Impact Analysis. Here Is What Arrives Without One.
A Traffic Impact Analysis is required in Fairfax County for rezoning applications generating significant new vehicle trips. Per the county’s own published guidance, a Comprehensive Transportation Analysis is required for proposals generating 250 or more peak hour trips or 2,500 average daily trips.
County transportation staff confirmed in writing on February 27th, 2026, that no TIA is required for this filing. Reason: it is a PRC plan amendment, not a rezoning. The applicant’s attorneys chose this filing structure knowing it avoided the traffic study requirement.
Here is what arrives on Colts Neck Road, Soapstone Drive, and South Lakes Drive without any traffic analysis:
RA Killed Its Own Tennis Court Lights. This Developer Is Proposing a 35-Foot Lighted Commercial Driving Range.
In 2021, the Reston Association board approved a project to add LED light poles to the Barton Hill tennis courts on Sunrise Valley Drive — a routine recreational upgrade in the PRC zone. The county ruled that adding lights to an existing facility in the PRC zone required a full PRC plan amendment, Planning Commission review, and Board of Supervisors approval.
RA appealed. The Board of Zoning Appeals upheld the county’s determination in October 2022. Rather than continue the fight, RA dropped the lights entirely. The Barton Hill courts were renovated without lighting.
RA could not light four tennis courts in this PRC zone. A private developer is proposing a 2-story commercial driving range with lighted targets, plus undefined night golf lighting across the course, in the same zone using the same process. The standard being applied appears to be different. That question deserves a written answer before November 4th.
There Is a Board Vote. Legislative Review Is Already Required. And the Supervisor Is Not Convinced by the Developer’s Argument.
On April 20th, 2026, I sent a formal policy inquiry to Supervisor Alcorn’s district office documenting the three active applications, the 288 vs 306-unit discrepancy, and the legal question around administrative versus legislative review. The written response arrived April 24th, 2026, from Mark Goldberg-Foss, Supervisor Alcorn’s land use aide.
Plain language: there is a Board vote. All three applications go to the 12-member Planning Commission together on November 4th, 2026. The Board of Supervisors vote follows if it passes the Planning Commission. Supervisor Alcorn has a vote — and his office has put on the record that he does not find the developer’s administrative argument convincing.
Alcorn has one vote on a ten-member Board, and John Carter of the Hunter Mill District on the Planning Commission has one vote. The other nine supervisors and 11 commissioners represent districts across Fairfax County. If the legal question around PRC plan amendments and pre-1975 zoning documents has implications beyond Reston — and land use attorney John Farrell’s public warning at the February 2026 Reston Association board meeting suggests it does — all ten supervisors and twelve commissioners have a stake in the outcome.
What the Community Should Be Asking Supervisor Alcorn’s Office and the Planning Commission
These are not emotional arguments. They are policy questions with the filed documents attached. Each one deserves a written answer before the November 4th Planning Commission hearing.
- Confirm that all proposed lighting — the 2-story driving range, lighted putting course, lighted short-game area, and night golf across ‘a portion of the course’ — complies with Reston’s PRC zone lighting standards. Provide the specific standard being applied and explain how it differs from the standard that prevented Reston Association from adding lights to four tennis courts at Barton Hill in 2022.
- Define at what scale, operating hours, or commercial intensity a permitted Category 5 ‘golf driving range’ use in a PRC residential zone becomes a commercial entertainment complex requiring its own commercial zoning designation or special exception approval. The current filed application proposes a 2-story, 35-foot, commercially operated, lighted-until-night facility with Top Tracer technology, a standalone restaurant, night golf, and indoor simulators. Where is that line?
- Confirm whether a single PRC plan amendment is the appropriate vehicle for simultaneously approving 306 new residential units AND converting 120 acres of golf course open space into a commercial entertainment complex that failed at the SSPA level twice — or whether the commercial component requires a separate zoning action with its own public review process.
This Is the Date. Here Is What You Can Do.
What You Can Do Right Now?
Email Supervisor Alcorn’s office and Commissioner Carter’s office before July 9th.
Reference the three application numbers: RZPA-2025-HM-00034, RZPA-2026-HM-00007, RZPA-2026-HM-00008.
Email: [email protected]
Subject: Reston National Golf Course — Oppose PRC Plan Amendment
I am: [Full Name] My Reston Cluster/Address: [Name and Address]
I am writing to oppose the three concurrent PRC plan amendment applications filed by Virginia Investment Partners 2019, LLC for Reston National Golf Course — RZPA-2025-HM-00034, RZPA-2026-HM-00007, and RZPA-2026-HM-00008.
This application proposes 306 new stacked condos AND a commercial entertainment complex — including a lighted driving range, night golf, and a mid-course restaurant — in a residential PRC community. No traffic study has been required. No lighting plan has been filed. Two prior attempts to redevelop this property failed through the proper Comprehensive Plan process.
I ask Supervisor Alcorn and Commissioner Carter to oppose this application and request that the county require a full traffic analysis and lighting study before the November 4th Planning Commission hearing.
Respectfully, [Name]
Plan to attend or submit written testimony for November 4th.
The Planning Commission hearing is open to public testimony — in person, by phone, or by pre-recorded video. Written testimony submitted in advance becomes part of the permanent public record. You do not need to attend in person to be heard. Sign-up opens at 1:00pm on the day of the hearing. Details at fairfaxcounty.gov/planning-development.
Share this analysis.
The three applications are technically public and practically invisible — searchable only by the developer’s full legal entity name: Virginia Investment Partners 2019 LLC. Visibility is the first step. If you find this useful, send it to every Reston neighbor who should know what is in those filed drawings.
The 36 Acres East of Soapstone Are Sitting Clean. And Hidden Creek Is Watching.
Virginia Investment Partners 2019, LLC owns three parcels comprising Reston National Golf Course — 48 acres along Sunrise Valley Drive, 81 acres on the western parcel where this application lives, and 36 acres east of Soapstone Drive. The 36-acre eastern parcel has no sheet in this application. No plans filed. No drawings. Held clean.
If the PRC plan amendment mechanism holds — if one filing can simultaneously approve 306 condos AND convert 120 acres of open space into a commercial entertainment complex, without a traffic study and without a separate commercial zoning review – 36-acre eastern parcel becomes the next move. Under the same legal argument. Using the same process.
South Reston is first. The eastern 36 acres of South Reston is next. And the precedent being set here does not stop at the South Lakes Drive boundary.
Reston National is one of two privately held PRC Open Space parcels in Reston. Hidden Creek Country Club (HCCC) — approximately 150 acres in North Reston, owned by Wheelock Communities — carries the identical zoning designation and the identical vulnerability to the same legal argument.
As of this writing, no PRC plan amendment applications for HCCC appear in Fairfax County’s PLUS system. Wheelock is not filing yet. They are watching South Reston establish the precedent.
They own 66 lots in Reston, largely between Reston Town Center (RTC) and the Wiehle / Sunset Hills area under a different legal entity than that which is listed for HCCC. They have broken ground and started building the luxury townhomes of Sunset Station off American Dream Way.
What borders the lot line of this development? HCCC, coincidence or staging / model home convenience? Will HCCC become the next Commercial FunZone of golf reimagined on an amendment versus SSPA process?
STAY INFORMED. TAKE ACTION.
Subscribe to receive direct updates on Reston development straight to you inbox.
SUBSCRIBE LINK AND ADD YOUR NAME TO THE LIST
Every subscriber becomes part of a documented constituent record to be delivered to Supervisor Alcorn’s office.
SHARE THIS POST WITH EVERY NEIGHBOR WHO NEEDS TO KNOW.
“𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙣𝙩𝙮 𝙙𝙚𝙛𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙗𝙪𝙞𝙡𝙩. 𝙍𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙤𝙣 𝘼𝙨𝙨𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙜𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙣𝙨 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙞𝙩 𝙡𝙤𝙤𝙠𝙨. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙈𝙐𝙎𝙏 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙢𝙪𝙣𝙞𝙩𝙮 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙩𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙣𝙮𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙚𝙡𝙨𝙚.” – 𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗲 𝗛𝘂𝗱𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗹 | 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗸 𝗘𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗛𝗢𝗔 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁
I am not an activist. I am a 30+ year market analyst from the tech market. I believe in sharing analysis for educational purposes.
𝘠𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘪𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘣𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘶𝘱𝘥𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘰𝘱𝘪𝘤 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘚𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘳 𝘈𝘭𝘤𝘰𝘳𝘯’𝘴 𝘰𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘦. 𝘐𝘵 𝘸𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘯𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘳𝘥 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘦𝘴 𝘰𝘳 𝘶𝘴𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘢𝘳𝘬𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘴.
Reston Zoning Series:
Michele Hudnall
Real Estate of Northern Virginia | Equity-First Real Estate Strategy
Life Long Northern Virginia Native | 25-Year Reston Resident | HOA Board President, Whitney Park East | South Lakes Drive
[email protected] | 703.867.3436
RealEstateofNVA.com | @realestateofnva
I help Northern Virginia buyers and sellers make smarter decisions with local market analysis, strategic guidance, and real-world context, not hype headlines.
Disclosure: Michele Hudnall is a licensed real estate agent in Virginia. This post represents her personal analysis as a Reston resident and does not constitute legal or financial advice. Full disclosure at RealEstateofNVA.com. All analysis and opinion are my own and based upon local, real-time data. Please consult with a financial or legal professional as required.
Privacy Statement | Disclosure Notice
Sources: All Publicly Accessible — No Subscription Required
Fairfax County PLUS System — All Three Applications: Fairfax County PLUS Search: Virginia Investment Partners 2019 LLC and check the box “search all records”
Filed PRC Plan Set (49 pages): https://plus.fairfaxcounty.gov RZPA-2026-HM-00007 and RZPA-2026-HM-00008 attachments
Statement of Justification — Cooley LLP: https://plus.fairfaxcounty.gov Filed March 2, 2026
Accepted Record Summary — RZPA-2026-HM-00008: https://plus.fairfaxcounty.gov Accepted March 27, 2026
Alcorn Office Written Response: https://huntermill.fairfaxcounty.gov April 24, 2026 — Mark Goldberg-Foss, Land Use Aide
Fairfax County Zoning Ordinance — PRC District: https://online.encodeplus.com/regs/fairfaxcounty-va Article 6, Section 302 — Category 5 permitted uses
Fairfax County Transportation — TIA Requirements: https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/transportation/traffic-impact-analysis
Fairfax County Transportation — CTA Requirements: https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/transportation/study/cta
FFXnow — Barton Hill lighting ruling: https://www.ffxnow.com/2022/12/02/new-lighting-no-longer-part-of-barton-hill-tennis-courts-upgrades/ December 2, 2022
FFXnow — Reston National two-pronged approach: https://www.ffxnow.com/2025/04/03/reston-national-golf-course-owner-takes-two-pronged-approach-to-proposed-redevelopment/ April 3, 2025
FFXnow — BOS rejection June 2025: https://www.ffxnow.com/2025/06/11/push-to-redevelop-reston-national-golf-course-for-housing-suffers-major-setback/ June 11, 2025
The Reston Letter — BOS vote coverage: https://www.therestonletter.com June 17, 2025
Fairfax Times — community response coverage: https://www.fairfaxtimes.com June 13, 2025
Rescue Reston: https://www.rescuereston.org
Fairfax County Real Estate Tax Rate 2026: https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/budget $1.1225 per $100 assessed value
